ISIS
is what it is. It is a terror organisation that appears, from what evidence
there is, to have been inspired and funded by a Western organisation or
government.
What
evidence? Well, admittedly uncorroborated and purely at my personal whim but…
Personal
curiosity wonders why a supposedly Islamic group have chosen to terrorise a
neighbourhood that borders on Israel when their (presumed) worst enemy escapes
without a single shot fired in that direction.
Instead
of the obvious choice of victim, the ISIS brigades have chosen to go into
battle against what might appear to be fellow Muslims.
One
wonders why this should be.
If
they are an Islamic group then they should follow the edicts laid down in the
Holy Qr’an and refrain from the killing of innocents and the destruction of
places of worship.
Muslims
are ordered to spare non-combatants and all places of worship; this includes
mosques, temples, churches and, even, synagogues.
Further
to this, it is ordained within the pages of the Holy Qr’an, that “your religion
is yours and my religion is mine…” I have paraphrased that a little but that
is, essentially, what it says.
There
is, it goes on to say, freedom of religion. Nobody is forcing you to adopt any
other religion and this applies in particular to Islam. Why is it, do you
think, that Islam does not have missionaries?
You
will possibly respond by saying that Islam converts people by the sword but
that clashes with the instruction given in the Holy Book about “no compulsion
in religion”.
It
seems that there are those who wish to cast a blight on others. There are those
who wish to use religion, of all stripes, for personal and political gain.
Sometimes it is for personal AND political gain, no doubt.
Thus
it comes to me that ISIS is not only a vicious gang of thugs out for personal
glory but that they do so at the behest of certain Western powers. Certainly
they appear to be well provided for in terms of firepower – from what source do
these weapons come?
Yes,
I hear those of you that will say that ISIS declares itself to be Islamic but
where is the proof? They do not conform to Islamic law and so the old proverb
applies:
“You can put a pig in a dress and call it Madam but still it remains a pig.”
Islamophobia reigns supreme and, certainly, there are plenty of cases where those who mock and point fingers are justified in doing so. But this applies equally to other religions, too. Where humans control the ideas of believers of all kinds then there will be distortions; there will be interpretations that are opposite to the original teachings; there will be misdeeds carried out in the name of their religion.
“You can put a pig in a dress and call it Madam but still it remains a pig.”
Islamophobia reigns supreme and, certainly, there are plenty of cases where those who mock and point fingers are justified in doing so. But this applies equally to other religions, too. Where humans control the ideas of believers of all kinds then there will be distortions; there will be interpretations that are opposite to the original teachings; there will be misdeeds carried out in the name of their religion.
The
average person is not highly educated in the words of their particular belief.
It becomes clear from entries on ‘Facebook’, for example, that the majority of
people have ‘cut and paste’ ideas – following those that appeal to them
personally, rather than what may be construed as ‘the truth’.
It
is those people who are aimed at by the religious leaders who wish to twist the
views of their followers.
On
another note, but on similar lines, I have observed yet another misuse of the
English language creeping into popularity.
This
is idea of ‘grooming’.
It
has been used in association with paedophiles and with religious groups.
‘Grooming’
is preparing someone for a pleasant experience; it is preparing a horse, or
other animal, for show – like a ‘bridegroom’!
The
process of gradually altering someone’s mindset to perform nasty deeds as
paedophiles and terrorists do is not ‘grooming’ it is brainwashing; it is
distorting the truth to suit a personal need or a perceived benefit that is to
the demise of other, possibly innocent, persons.
That,
dear reader, is where we came in at the top of the page.
No comments:
Post a Comment