I am, as usual, confused.
To be fair, I have not
actually seen this series that appears to be so popular but…
It is called ‘The Walking
Dead’. The latest information in hand from those who do watch it is that it is
about to draw to a close.
This observation comes as
some relief.
The relief is not because it
is aired – or not, but because, now that it is to end I will not be ostracised
by those who tell me that it is the greatest thing since… well… the last
greatest thing on TV. I am plagued by people who tell me that I should watch it
and are aghast because I do not.
The thing I noticed from the
trailers, of which there are so many – thus precluding my need to watch it
since I have already seen the ‘best bits’, is that these ‘zombies’ spend their
time staggering around exceedingly slowly in an almost blind manner and yet,
when they attack, they seem possessed by some organised will and speed that is
belied by their ‘normal’, shuffling, mien.
Therefore I am confused. Are
these the same groups of zombies or have I missed some specific and vital point
somewhere?
Another thing.
I have observed that, on most
television channels that we see here (irrespective of the company transmitting
the channel) there are strings of tedious advertisements.
Here is the confusion: the
advertisements are, presumably, to generate revenue. Yes? Then why are most of
the advertisements – ‘all of them’ on some channels, proclaiming the delights
of future programmes that will be airing on that channel? Where is the income
from that?
It is true that I am not a
businessman and so I do not see the ‘big picture’ even though I have a 52” flat
screen TV (for watching football – ‘soccer’ in the US). Clearly there is money
being made from this but I do not see how it can be done.
Do people really watch all
those programmes? Are people really so hypnotised by the ‘Goggle-Box that they
no longer appreciate, or are aware of, real life?
To watch them all takes time
and dedication. Have these programmes replaced people’s reality?
To see some of the ‘reality’
shows that are abundant it would seem that we, as a species, are less capable
of separating fact from fiction.
There are characters within
many of these shows who are famous for being famous but have no skills or
talents beyond their day-to-day life
This adds to my confusion.
The other day a name was
mentioned to me. I thought the person I was conversing with was referring to a
friend of theirs so, as you do, I asked where they lived.
I was peered at as if I had
just dropped in from the moon. It would appear that the person being spoken of
is a celebrity; they are famous; everyone knows that person.
I do not. I had to ‘Google’
the name and am none the wiser for that.
Because I have no clue who
the person is, the statement that ‘everyone knows’ is rendered factually
incorrect.
The terms ‘always’ and
‘everyone’, to make two examples, are all-inclusive. You only need one
occasion, or one person, to deviate from that and the sentence containing that
term is now void.
But, the fact remains, I
was unaware of the identity of that ‘famous’ person.
And that makes me the
outsider – the ‘oddball’, if you will.
We are to be judged by our
knowledge of irrelevancies and banal information spewed out from sources that
are designed to feed us sop; it keeps us in place, it keeps us dumb and servile.
Never mind the ‘World’, we
must concentrate, and worry about, what happens on the latest episode of our
favourite shows.
One wonders, now, on which
side of the ‘flat screen’ the zombies really live.
No comments:
Post a Comment