Popular,
isn’t it? Pornography.
We know
this to be true because it is a several billion dollars industry worldwide.
Sex
sells. Everything. It sells everything from washing machines to cars to
toothpaste.
When did
you last see a young lady who is not slim and shapely with astonishingly good
looks selling something? Anything.
Persons
who are genetically indisposed towards that which is considered attractive in
the current milieu are not to be used for advertising purposes.
The first
idea is to sell the girl; if you like the girl then you will buy the product.
That is the psychology of it.
All
salesmen sell themselves first. This is followed by the product.
So, of
course, sex sells sex.
In
Victorian times, a period of great prudishness, they put covers over the legs
of tables and chairs to prevent impropriety and rude thoughts when looking at
the furniture. They also had sex clubs where people could watch, or indulge in,
acts of sex that were not easily obtainable elsewhere.
It was
also a time when young maidservants might be offered a choice—either discard
the baby or leave the job. This was so that the people around the area would
not see the personal likeness of the baby to the master of the house, no doubt.
So the
World progressed.
We had
photography and films—movies, if you will. Both forms of celluloid that would
preserve whatever they captured for posterity.
Not
unnaturally, the photographer would turn his lens on to a pretty young girl. He
might very well ask her to disrobe a little, at first, and then the sky would
be the limit.
Laws were
introduced to protect those of a more delicate nature and children.
Initially
it was forbidden to show two people on a bed even if both were dressed. Then
relaxation of the rules set in; people could be a couple on the bed providing
one foot was on the floor.
This was
the thin end of the wedge.
It led to
a total, almost, dropping of the rules and the clothes.
We have
reached a point where the beautiful Selma Hayek and Antonio Banderas bounced
around naked together on a bed in ‘Desperado’ and the equally lovely Halle
Berry was set upon by Billy Bob Thornton in ‘The Monster’s Ball’. There are
many more examples of this degree of acting in total nudity extant but you get
the picture—to coin a phrase!
Similarly,
the televisual programmes have not been slow to keep up.
The rules
regarding what can be beamed directly into people’s homes have been similarly
revised to allow total nudity.
In
‘Spartacus’ there is not only simulated sex of the most graphic nature but also
full frontal male scenes. ‘Game of Thrones’ is, similarly explicit.
Both of
these series are excellent stories but there is a compulsion to include scenes
that are lewd. Do they add to the story or do they exist in order to draw
viewers as a boost to the ratings?
Even on a
personal level, on social media sites, there is a tendency towards allowing
ever more distracting material.
A friend
of mine is a stunningly beautiful young lady who does bodybuilding. She is not
muscle bound, she is lithe, slim and athletic. In the competitions that she
enters most of her body is displayed so that it can be judged in comparison
with her peers.
On the
other side of the coin it should be said that she is not only a lovely person
who is possessed of great intelligence and humour but also has a determination,
a will to succeed, that leaves me exhausted with her efforts in training for
these events.
Her name
is Chandra—I am sure she will not mind me telling everyone her name.
She also
does a little modelling.
Some of her
photos appear on ‘Facebook’.
They are
chaste. Modest by today’s standards and yet there is much nakedness. The
‘important parts’ are covered but that which is not covered increases
desirability because her body is toned to perfection, it is a male dream. It
arouses desire.
So what
is ‘pornography’?
I have
been told that I am ignorant for asking such a question. I have been, almost,
derided for stating that a photograph of two people kissing is pornography. Can
you say that it is not?
Where
does sex start? Tell me that, if you can. If I touch the naked hand of a young
lady I am making contact flesh to flesh. Is that acceptable? People will say
that it is. Perhaps if I now touch her wrist, is that fine? At what point is
the line drawn? Where do we say that it is not an acceptable thing for me to
touch her?
Even in
films there are some things that are hidden. There is not, for example, very
much fondling of breasts going on or views of the insertion of the male into
the female.
Perhaps
what I have just written is arousing a flame of desire; a flickering of sexual
arousal and becomes pornography.
Corporations
who want to make money out of a perfectly natural desire for people to
reproduce have pushed us into a numb acceptance of sex and sexual images.
Sex is
wonderful. There is nothing better in the World. Deliberately so because it
drives us to make babies.
I am not
prim, prudish or prissy. My stories are full of sex and references to sex. It
is the prime mover behind ‘The Adepts’.
I have
seen life. Twenty-seven years of it in the military. Military gentlemen,
indeed, military ladies, too, are rarely reticent about sex. We know what it
is; we know what it is about. We can discuss it without blushing or giggling.
But where
does it start?
Photographs
of people kissing are, at some level, pornography.
Soft,
moist lips brushing against the lips of another person. Hot breath pulsing into
another person’s mouth and wet tongues touching each other in intimacy; it is a
private thing, a personal moment into which other people should not intrude;
where other people are not welcome.
So what
is pornography?
My rule
is—would you show it to your Mum or daughter?
I was told by an old friend of mine the reason why Playboy sells more than Playgirl. It's because Adam was seduced by what he saw and Eve was seduced by what she heard.
ReplyDeleteThat could well be true. Although there are a lot of women who like visual pornography there are many who are still shy - they stick to the mindset that tells them they should not be affexted by it.
DeleteResearch has shown that women are equally arooused by graphic images as are men and that they look at men in similar places as men look at women (and I don't mean the kitchen and the park!).