For some
hours I have been cogitating memories that have accrued over the past hundred
and twenty years. From time to time there have been little blips on the smooth
passage of time through my head that give pause for thought.
One of
those blips is this.
Partners
are abused. This seems to happen more often than it should and there is very
little reason for it.
We cannot
say that there is no reason because somebody, somewhere, will be able to
justify violence—physical and psychological, using some context or other.
Let’s
start with the distaff side of this.
A young
lady, or, perhaps, a lady who is not quite so young, meets a male person with
whom she desires to spend the rest of her life. She is aware of his
shortcomings, usually, before they enter into any sort of long term
relationship but, like most women, she will entertain the idea that he can be
changed.
All women
do this.
I have
had many wives over the years and all of them, I am certain, have decided that
I do not fit that fine mental mould that they have imagined for me.
Nevertheless, it is a shape that, they are certain, I can be modelled into over
the coming months or years.
They
fail.
It cannot
be done.
Leopards,
as they say, do not change their spots. External appearances notwithstanding,
the basic mindset of the average human male stays precisely where it was when
they attained the age of seven years.
Their
proud male personage now entertains himself by abusing her. He might, for
instance, pinch her ears with a pair of pliers or he might try to strangle her.
Maybe he will just go for a good old-fashioned punching.
On the
other hand, he may use psychological terrors. He may, for example, take her out
to a function and then, on arrival, abandon her to go and mix with his male
friends.
He may
deprive her of cash or he might use her cash and thus render her helpless
financially so that she requires to beg for money to feed herself and their
offspring.
One
wonders why she tolerates it. Very often, it is my experience, the woman might
leave him only to return fairly soon afterwards because ‘he needs me’ or ‘I
love him’.
Do they
forget the pain? Do they imagine that he has learnt some sort of convoluted
lesson from this and will not be nasty to her any more?
She is
misled. This reformation will not happen. Very likely it will only become
worse.
This is
not a life for her, it is an existence; a poor one full of pain and misery.
What
about him?
He has
decided that he wishes to spend the rest of his life with this woman. She is
the one for him without any doubt at all.
Yet, soon
after the union is made official, he decides that it is time to teach her a
bloody good lesson. For what?
I have
interviewed and counselled several couples who have been involved in this type
of situation. I have asked the man what it is that he hopes to achieve by his
treatment of her. He doesn’t know.
What is
it that she is doing wrong to promote this treatment being meted out? He doesn’t
know.
Is she
bad at cooking? Does she iron his clothes imperfectly? Is she hopeless in bed?
No. None of these things seem to apply
It is my
thought that he is objecting to a loss of independence. That he is suddenly
tied down and being made responsible for her and, usually, a child. His
yearning for his pre-marriage freedom triggers this response and will be
accompanied by a lack of responsibility for both wife and little one(s).
I agree
that sometimes a husband is abused by his wife. Occasionally his response to
that is violent. Sometimes his wife may be unfaithful and that will set off a
physical reaction.
Sometimes
he will be unfaithful and that, too, will set off a similar reaction from her.
Alcohol
and gambling are serious causes of marital unhappiness because both will drain
the finances. Since most causes of unhappiness are either financial or seeing ‘greener
grass’ in the shape of another person (especially after drinking!) then these
two addictions should be addressed at square one—before entering into a
marriage contract.
The
scenarios are multitudinous but they all, invariably, have an unhappy outcome.
One
wonders why people do not split up? If they are unhappy then they should
separate and live apart. This would be, by preference, before there are children
involved.
Of
course, it is always easier to be a historian than a prophet but, sometimes,
surely, we can learn from the mistakes of others.
How often
(clue: very) do I say to my students that people hear but they do not listen;
they look but they do not see; they think but they do not analyse.
Love just
makes it worse. We stop seeing, we stop listening and, worst of all, we stop
thinking.
The cure?
There is none. Again, from experience, beating someone who is maltreating his
wife in order to show him what she is feeling is a failure; he will believe
that his wife is the cause of the beating because she has ‘ratted him out’ or
shown her bruises to someone and he will respond by renewing his ill treatment
of her as perceived revenge.
The only
answer is to get the recipient of the bruises, mental and physical, to stand up
for themselves and make a new life—one that they will enjoy.
Or, at
least, one that they will enjoy more than the one they currently have.
Leopards
do not change their spots.
Ever.
Ironically, a sadist and a masochist may make a perfect couple, but it will become a lose-lose situation. Nobody benefits from that union.Freedom, by the way, is achieved by trust, not control.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Hence the old saying that you let a bird fly. If it comes back it's yours; if you never see it again it was never yours in the first place.
Delete